Insights and News

Anchor selection is one of the most important decisions in offshore mooring design. While holding capacity is a fundamental consideration, it is only one part of a much broader engineering challenge. The selected anchor can influence mooring design, installation methodology, project economics, inspection requirements and long-term system performance.

Many ageing FPSOs are operating well beyond their original design life. As operators pursue asset life extension and continued production, understanding the true fatigue condition of critical mooring components becomes increasingly important. Traditional tension-tension (TT) fatigue assessment remains a widely used approach for mooring analysis, but what happens when TT fatigue analysis alone no longer captures the full picture?

Selecting the right mooring chain is a critical part of offshore mooring system design. Whether you're planning a temporary mooring spread, evaluating equipment requirements, or reviewing installation parameters, having quick access to accurate chain data can save valuable time.

Offshore wind is expanding faster than any other energy sector. The drive for larger turbine capacities and improved project economics is forcing offshore wind into deeper waters and harsher environments, demanding larger monopiles, greater penetration depths, and far more precise installation methods. At the same time, developers face rising cost pressures, tightening weather windows, supply bottlenecks, and increasingly strict environmental regulations, especially around underwater and airborne noise.

A recent evaluation examined the operational efficiency of a Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) using a thruster‑assisted mooring system versus a standalone dynamic positioning (DP) system in deepwater conditions. The study focused on three key metrics: fuel consumption, CO₂ emissions, and overall cost impact.

As our recent blog series has shown, scaling offshore energy depends on integration across every stage of delivery, from reliable moorings and precise seabed intelligence to adaptable engineering design. Now, as the offshore wind industry races toward gigawatt-scale developments, offshore wind foundations have become the next frontier for efficiency and innovation.

The offshore energy market is entering a new era of demand and complexity. Floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) activity is surging across South America, Africa and Asia, with schedules tightening and vessel availability remaining a critical constraint. According to Rystad Energy, over $70 billion in FPSO capex is forecast over the next decade – around 85% of it concentrated in these three regions. As investment ramps up and timelines compress, every day offshore counts.

The offshore energy sector is evolving rapidly. Both oil and gas fields and offshore wind farms are under pressure to deliver reliable energy while keeping projects affordable. The design choices engineers make today will determine whether these projects remain adaptable, resilient and ready to meet future challenges or whether they become locked into costly, rigid solutions that limit flexibility for decades.

Advanced geospatial intelligence gives offshore teams a clear view of subsurface conditions, enabling proactive planning, cost control and more predictable project delivery.

When planning a Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) project, the Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) study is where strategy meets precision. For mooring engineers and project managers, this phase sets the foundation for safe, efficient, and cost-effective mooring solutions. 

Offshore decommissioning is one of the most complex and costly challenges facing the oil and gas industry today. Over the next 20 years, global spending is projected to reach $200 billion on more than 2,800 fixed platforms.

Most marine infrastructure has a prescribed shelf life. But in practice, it’s often expected to remain in service well beyond it. Across offshore energy, platforms, moorings and subsea cables are operating well past their intended lifespans. Yet many operators still rely on outdated, time-based inspection regimes that miss early warning signs - leaving them vulnerable to unplanned outages and costly failures.